Showing posts with label elEVen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label elEVen. Show all posts

Friday, June 25, 2010

Work on the CAN network

Hey Everyone,
My name is Erick, I'm a rising Senior in the Aero/Astro department and I'm pretty awesome. But enough about me, let's talk about what I've done.

I am working on the CAN network for the elEVen. In a few sentences, the CAN network is composed of nodes and communicates between nodes using 3 wires. Those wires are named CAN-High, CAN-Low and ground. When the voltage difference is zero, that is understood as a bit with a value of one and conversely, when the voltage difference is not zero, that is understood as a bit with value of zero. Do this thousands of times a second and you start to get a serious amount of traffic going through these three wires.

As a learning exercise, I am practicing with the Porsche 914 that we have already converted and am putting a few finishing touches on the interfaces. In order to tap in to this network, National Instruments has hooked us up with a CompactRIO with a CAN Module. I installed LabVIEW and have been messing around with it for a few days. After finally figuring out why I couldn't connect to the cRIO and the touch panel, here is the result of a few hours of work:


Once I become more familiar with LabVIEW, I will be able to receive, parse and send CAN messages. This will allows us to communicate vital messages, like the state of charge of the battery pack, vehicle speed, as well as slightly less vital messages, like what radio station you are listening to.

I'm excited to be working with the Electric Vehicle Team this summer and looking forward to all of the projects, which you will hear about through this blog, come to fruition.

Oh yeah, make sure to follow us on twitter!

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Quick Fabrication Update

We've got the new high voltage wiring routed in the car, the battery mounting enclosure is almost completed and Mike is tweaking the chain drive unit. There's no design work left at this point: the path to the finish line is clear, with a rush to finish the final assembly.


Sprockets and chain guard are in place, with Mike grinding a small channel to make room for the motor encoder wire.









Kevin, finishing the enclosure for the trunk-mounted battery pack.








The orange high-voltage (356 Volts) shielded battery cable runs from the rear to the front of the car, from the battery pack to the motor controller.

Arya has been working on getting the hood latch assembly back in place - it had to get cut off to make room for the motor controller enclosure (the clear plastic box to the right of the engine bay with the orange cables running into it).

Friday, August 7, 2009

Fabrication Progress

The motor/differential/speed reducer assembly and the motor controller (the two largest components in the engine bay) are mounted in their final locations. It barely fits - had the controller been 1 inch larger on any side and it wouldn't have fit in the engine bay unless the motor and transaxle were a parallel unit (motor laying flat, transversely in the car), with the controller laying flat on top of it. An advantage of the current configuration is that the motor, controller, gear drive and differential are all visible from the top, useful for outreach/demonstration.

Motor/speed reducer/differential assembly Version 2.0 is hanging from the lift; on the right you can see the motor controller (the black box) mounted in a polycarbonate enclosure (we went a little overkill on the waterproofing).





This photo is taken from inside of the engine compartment; you can see the clearance between the motor controller box and the top of the hood (the underside of the sheet metal) is about half of an inch.






The new motor frame, as seen above, clamped to the welding table - this is necessary to prevent the welding heat form warping the frame. This is version 2.0, which is slimmer and allows for the clearance to mount the motor controller next to it in parallel.





The components for the chain-drive speed reducer. From the left: flexplate adapter (connects the lower chain sprocket shaft to the differential); spline shaft and sprocket spacers (connects to the motor at the top); lower chain sprocket shaft with the lower bearing mounted and the other side of the triangular flex plate adapter.

Saturday, August 1, 2009

Nonstop Fabrication

We've been working around the clock (well, almost - a typical day starts at 10am and goes until 2am, including weekends) to get the fabrication done. We finally have the components we need and our CAD models are worked out, with the final assembly and mounting left. The pictures below may explain the lack of blog posts in the past few days.

The choice between spending more time in front of a computer vs. spending time in the shop with a TIG welder usually favors the latter: we can't wait to get this car on the road.

Mike, welding the coolant pump mount to the frame rail.






Matt, machining the 1/2 inch thick aluminum walls for the chain drive enclosure. The bearing plates for this cannot be allowed to flex at all, otherwise the chains (we're using 4 in parallel) will become unevenly loaded, leading to a cascading failure after the first chain snaps.




Arya, about to mount the wiring harness/interconnect box.






The motor / diff frame assembled and mounted in the car. A 1.7:1 ratio chain drive connects the two. This is our first iteration of this frame; currently we're working on the second one, that will be slimmer at the bottom and slightly offset to the left, to make room for the motor controller box.




A (very rough) mounting of the motor controller box. This will house the 640A, 400V controller electronics, and needs to be watertight. It's constructed from 1/4" polycarbonate, with a 3/8" sheet on the mounting surface of the controller. 1/2" thick polycarb is bulletproof.. It's waterjetted and dovetailed at the ends, which will be bonded and sealed with silicone.



Jigging up the motor/controller frame, version 2.0. This time we'll get it right . . . no warped joints, no flex, slimmer by 4.5" at the bottom, leaving more room in the engine bay for mounting other components and (future) battery modules.





The sponsor logos on the car, prepped for the open house (the shop was much cleaner for that event). We had the president, provost, supporting faculty and corporate sponsors stop by and attendance remained strong throughout the evening.


The custom 17-spline shaft for the motor is finally here. It was much cheaper to send the shaft out to be made via EDM (electrical discharge machining) rather than a conventional broaching method.



. . . more to come in the next few days

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

News Update

Nick Barber from IDG News Service stopped by last week; below is the video.




Sunday, July 12, 2009

elEVen: Work Day 1

Engine, transmission, exhaust, fuel tank, hybrid battery, center console, 2 front seats removed.
15 hours, 16 cans of Monster.





Friday, July 10, 2009

Team Update


The team has been preparing for this moment: a 2010 Mercury Milan Hybrid is sitting on our lift, about to be assaulted by all of the tools in our shop. Within three days the most patented car in automotive history will have its hybrid drive system sitting on the floor of our shop in a corner, to be replaced by our 250 horsepower electric bus motor and lithium-iron phosphate battery pack.

With these delays, we have exactly four weeks to finish the mechanical conversion of the car. The new motor cooling system is set up, the 650A controller is tested, the limited slip differential with 7.33:1 gears is ready, the A123 battery pack communications have been resolved and the raw material stock has been ordered. As students, all we have is man-hours to throw at the problem; given the timeline, we’re grateful to our friends at Monster. The details of this intense grind will, of course, be posted for your viewing pleasure.

Driving the elEVen base vehicle to Cambridge

Dan and I picked-up the team's Mercury Milan Hybrid at Ford Motor Company in Dearborn yesterday morning and drove it back to Cambridge. (But not before first enjoying a nice sunny sky in Michigan. It has been unusually cloudy and raining in Boston ever since early June.)We left Dearborn around 5:00 pm yesterday evening and arrived at the EVT shop at around 9:00am this morning. We opted for the longer route, passing through Toledo, Cleveland, Buffalo, Syracuse, Albany, and Springfield instead of through Canada. Plus we got to see all sorts of cool and interesting rest stops along the way!* (See example parking lots on the right.)

Driving for 16 hours straight (our only long stop was for dinner), wasn't nearly as painful as I think either of us expected. Due in part to the vehicle we got to test drive the entire way. Ford's improved hybrid system uses a e-CVT and larger, more powerful electric motors. The Milan Hybrid gets an EPA fuel economy rating of 41 mpg in the city and 36 mpg on the highway and can run in EV-mode up to 47 mph. More information:
http://www.mercuryvehicles.com/milan/


Not only is the Milan Hybrid an efficient hybrid system, it has the new Synch system, a great navigation system, and (most importantly for nerd engineers like us), an interactive and highly configurable instrument panel geared toward increasing fuel economy. You can even configure the vehicle to display fuel consumption (in L/100km) instead of fuel economy (in mpg). For information about why this is so useful see: http://www.mpgillusion.com/



Here's an image of the instrument panel from http://articles-ford.blogspot.com:

And here I am filling our car up, for possibly the last time, in Springfield, MA:



* Indicates sarcasm

Monday, June 29, 2009

The Battery Pack

The past week or so has been spent designing a prototype battery pack for Lennon's electric motorcycle, eMoto (http://www.electricmotion.org). We'll be replacing his 240 pounds of old-school lead acid batteries with a 30 pound pack of A123 LiFe cells. Of course, this pack will only have about 75% the capacity of the lead acid stack, but the power and weight improvements will be significant.

This pack isn't a favor for Lennon though. It'll serve as a test platform for future pack design for the elEVen, as well as demonstrate rapid-recharge capabilities on a smaller scale. Consequently, the pack has a very similar architecture to that of the proposed elEVen pack. We've run into a lot of problems during the design process which we never anticipated. It's very likely we'll run into the same problems on the full sized elEVen pack, so hopefully we'll be able to get a lot of bugs out with this small scale version.

Here's an overview of the basic design, both for the elEVen and the eMoto:

Modularity: It is rather difficult to make an electric vehicle without using high voltage, which can be very dangerous to work with if proper precautions are not taken (just like gasoline in ICE cars. It's just a property of high energy systems). The obvious solution for dealing with the dangers of high voltage is to eliminate the high voltage itself. We are accomplishing this by building several independent low voltage modules, which will be wired in series to create the high voltage required only at the very end.
The eMoto pack will consist of two 19.8 volt (6 cells in series) modules and two 16.5 volt (5 cells in series) modules wired in series to reach the nominal voltage of roughly 72 volts (required for the motor controller). Each module will have 10 cells in parallel to achieve a capacity of 1.6 kWh for the entire pack. We originally intended to use three 24 volt modules, since the elEVen will be using 24 volt modules, however, we decided to use the existing battery mounting on the eMoto. This made arranging seven of the ten cell batteries in series very difficult. Thus, we arrived at the much simpler pack design we currently have.
We anticipate that the elEVen pack will consist of 24 volt modules with 72 cells in series. However, the issues we ran into with the geometric constraints of the motorcycle could arise when designing around the existing chassis of the elEVen. Hopefully the experience with the eMoto will help us keep our future designs a little more flexible. Additionally, the eMoto will have the four modules wired directly to each other. We plan to connect the elEVen modules with contactors, allowing the packs to disconnect and drop the maximum voltage to 24 volts. This will provide a safer working environment as well as making the vehicle safer if it is ever involved in an accident. Finally, each module will have a built in Battery Management System (BMS), which will then communicate to a master module to balance all of the modules together.

Inter-cell Connections:The individual cells of the modules have to be connected some how. We took a lot of advise from the likes of Bob Simpson (http://www.evdrive.com) and Bill Dube (http://www.killacycle.com/) and have decided to use nickel plates spot welded to all of the cell terminals as the interconnects. These nickel plates will be bent to help arrange the cells in each module. They also have tabs for individual cells with integrated fuses to protect the pack should a cell internally short.

Cooling:As we rapidly recharge the cells and continuously discharge them, they will heat up. Though warm cells have a lower internal impedance and are therefore more efficient, running the cells too hot will damage the internal structure and reduce the life of the pack. We'll be air-cooling the cells across the electrical contacts, since they are both electrically and thermally coupled to the inside of the cell. We don't anticipate that a lot of cooling will be required (see the section on battery data which will be posted soon), but we want our design to be flexible in case more cooling is required. We accomplished this by spacing the cells vertically to allow airflow. However, we have not finalized the method of spacing (the leading idea can be seen below). We're also looking into various methods of cooling, including passive cooling and using various arrangements of computer cooling fans for active cooling. We'll be testing the effects of various cooling systems once we finish the prototype eMoto pack.Cell enclosure: This has surprisingly been one of the more difficult aspects of the pack design. The cells need to be restrained somehow, and in the case of the eMoto, the enclosure also needs to be able to take a compressive load. We were originally looking at using FR4 as the primary cell enclosure for its insulating and fire retardant properties, and an aluminum secondary enclosure to provide rigidity. Since then, we've looked at a single FR4 enclosure design, an FR4 primary and polycarbonate secondary, polycarbonate primary and secondary, and a single polycarbonate enclosure. Currently, we've decided on a 1/8” polycarbonate primary which will likely be encased in a polycarbonate secondary with possible rubber shock-mounts in between the two layers. The shock-mounting will reduce the effects of vibration on the cells, hopefully preventing any of the connecting welds from breaking.
After figuring out the enclosure materials, we had to design a good way of creating a box. This sounds trivial, but there is a lot more that goes into it than meets the eye. In our case, we were limited to making the box out of sheets of polycarbonate. This was the only cost effective way of obtaining all of the necessary features, such as cooling slots and cell dividers. Machining a solid piece of polycarbonate into the shape we wanted would take too much time, cost too much money, and waste too much material. Therefore, we had to come up with a good way of joining the polycarbonate sheets together into a box. We looked into drilling and tapping screw holes into the thin face of the polycarbonate, but in order to do so, we would need to use #0-80 machine screws. That method of fastening seemed impractical and labor intensive while possibly being insufficiently strong. We also looked into chemically bonding the polycarbonate together. We've decided to do so on the prototype eMoto pack, with the addition of interlocking tabs for added mechanical reinforcement. We are considering using polycarbonate angle stock to reinforce the corners. As of now, the box seems pretty rigid.



As of now, we've assembled the primary enclosure with dead cells, and we are waiting on the battery welder. We've received the weld samples, so the welder should come in sometime this week. Once we have that, we will begin matching cells and electrically assembling the prototype pack. To prepare for this, Paul and I have been testing boxes of cells to weed out the obvious bad ones. We're looking to manufacture the secondary enclosure this week, as well as experimenting with various cooling designs. Additionally, Shane and Lennon have been working on our first rapid-recharge charger for the motorcycle. If we're lucky, we'll be rapid-recharging our first pack by the end of the week.



Look for test data and more images soon.

-Mike

Friday, June 26, 2009

Sizing up the Ford Fusion Hybrid

Dropping an electric bus motor and a Ford 9" differential into a modern mid-sized sedan is no easy task. While we're waiting on delivery of our conversion vehicle (locked in, will finally get here in two weeks), we're doing everything possible to prepare the new drivetrain outside of the vehicle.

So while Kevin is bench-testing the motor and controller system, Matt has been gettting the drivetrain components together that will connect from the motor to the wheels, and he's had an amazing find in picking out a differential that has exactly the gearing we need.

Electric motors can spin at high RPM (ours goes to 12,000) and have a very broad torque range; our vehicle will only need one gear ratio to reach 100mph. To match this speed with the top speed of our motor, we need a gear ratio of 7.3:1. The Ford 9" differential has a huge aftermarket following among the rock-crawler crowd and there are a few companies that make very low gearing for it. Luckily, the lowest one we've been able to find is 7.3:1, exactly what we need. This means we can drive the motor directly to the differential, eliminating the need for a high-speed gear reducer (an expensive piece of equipment that would have otherwise needed to have custom made).

To double check that all of the components will fit before we order them, we took a couple of measurements off of a 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid (Ford is donating us a Mercury Milan Hybrid, but they're the same vehicle mechanically). We have a few options for fitting the motor and differential into the car; they will be in a T-shape, so the motor will be sitting in the car longitudinally. The motor with the differential coupled to it will have a length of 90cm. The distance from the center of the front axle to the radiator is 65cm, too short for the system. We'll need to connect the differential to the front wheels, with the motor sitting behind it.

However, this mounting also leads to a few other problems: we need to get by the steering rack, a few subframe mounts, and make room for the motor in the exhaust tunnel. Fortunately, the tunnel is already relatively large. We also have plenty of interior room in the car's center console location to enlarge the tunnel with no visual modifications to the vehicle interior. This may also mean connecting the motor to the differential with a CV joint at an angle to not disturb the steering rack; we will find out for sure once we remove the drivetrain. Until then, we're looking to order the differential, gearing and an IRS center housing with CV style ends.

Friday, June 19, 2009

Initial schematics for the BMS circuitry

Over the past few days, initial schematics for the BMS circuitry have been designed and redesigned.  To monitor each battery voltage, we have decided to settle on a difference amplifier topology which will then feed into an Analog to digital converter on a TI MSP430 chip (Fig. 1).  The MSP430 will then run an algorithm to sort out the minimum battery voltage within the module and start bleeding the other batteries until they are balanced.  The bleeding circuit may be created using an optically coupled p-channel device which turns on an n-channel transistor (Fig. 2).  Eventually, individual temperature monitoring for the slave boards will be added and a master module will be designed to include inter-module balancing as well.  Please keep in mind that this circuitry is still preliminary and not everything has been simulated to ensure that everything works as expected. 

- This circuitry was designed by Bin Lu and Eric Winokur


(figure 1)

(figure 2)

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Wednesday June 10th, 2009

Today the elEVen team focused on safety and writing up the safety guidelines that they will be presenting. The Porsche team continued working towards aligning the transmission.

Eleven Team Member Highlights: Safety and batteries.



Radu sent out a proposed budget to The Edgerton center and the team. He got the full battery shipment and they are now in the N51 lab. He spent the rest of the day setting up for the Edgerton safety presentation.

Kevin has been writing up safety documentation for the motor and motor controller. Additionally, he worked on writing up documentation to safely disassemble the Fusion.

Matt helped move the battery shipment. He also worked on writing up general shop safety guidelines.

Arya worked on writing up the teams daily procedures in preparation for the Edgerton safety presentation.

Mike worked on writing up battery safety guidelines and dealing with the cells. He looked into regulations for safety equipment needed for dealing with certain voltages.



The Porsche team continued working on aligning the transmission. Today, they were able to safely remove the transmission and motor from underneath the car.








Finally got it out.